Signature Gatherers and Utah Prop 4

Published January 15th 2026

TL;DR

Proposition 4 was voted on and passed into law in 2018. It establishes an independent committee separate from the legislature to draw district boundaries, with the aim of preventing Gerrymandering. Signature gatherers are trying to get it back on the ballot so it can be challenged and potentially struck down.

The committee is composed of 7 members chosen “one by the Governor, three by legislative majority party leaders, and three by legislative minority party leaders”.

Here’s a rough framework for deciding whether to sign, please see below for more details and do your own research:

  • Do you want Prop 4 to be challenged on the ballot, and put to a second vote? ===> You may want to sign.

  • Do you like Prop 4 and don’t want it voted on for a second time? ===> You may not want to sign.

  • Do you want to remove your signature from something you already signed? ===> There is a form on the county website. I believe you have to print it, fill it out, and mail it in. Detailed instructions here

  • Do you want more context, information, and history about what is going on? ===> Read the original voter information PDF, or see below:

Why I’m writing this post

It’s currently the second week of the Spring 2026 semester at the University of Utah, and I’ve been approached by signature gatherers outside the library or elsewhere on campus 4-5 times at this point. Last week I had a longer conversation with one of the signature gatherers, who treated me decently enough and who I got to know a little bit. He told me he’s from Detroit, and we spoke for a while about the ramifications of Prop 4. I pressed him on the issue for a while and eventually he admitted he didn’t really believe in what he was gathering signatures for, but he had been “given an offer he couldn’t refuse” (his words, not mine). I tried to keep it cordial with him, but not all students have had pleasant interactions with representatives from their organization.

For instance, a few days later I spoke with a student (from UVU) inside the Marriott Library (UofU) carrying a “Decline to Sign” poster (counter to the purposes of the signature gatherers). Evidently a few minutes after I spoke with him in the library he went outside with his sign and a signature gatherer became verbally aggressive with him, going so far as to tear his sign in half. He (the other student) texted me a picture of the torn sign, I only have the details he’s texted me and I did not witness the event personally, but he said that the signature gatherer: “ripped my sign up and stepped up on me telling me he was gonna beat the shit out of me”.

With his permission I’m including a picture of him and his sign here:

Image of protester with sign ripped in half

There’s been some criticism (reported on by the Salt Lake Tribune and KSL) that signature gatherers are engaging in deceptive practices and obtaining signatures by misleading signers. The organization hiring them claims this is untrue.

In the spirit of being informed (and finding literally anything to do other than my homework) I sat down after that first interaction with a signature gatherer and did some research on the history of the issue, what Prop 4 is, and how we got to where we are today.

I chose not to sign. That being said, this post is intended to be a relatively neutral and informal statement of the facts/timeline with links to more in-depth sources. I’m not affiliated with the organizations mentioned here, nor am I being paid or compensated in any way to write this post. I’m a student who keeps being approached by signature gatherers. I’m posting my notes here in hopes that they will help others be more informed and make a conscious decision, with no confusion, regardless of their political affiliations.

Summary of Who’s Involved on Both Sides:

Timeline of events:

(Drawn partially from this Ballotpedia page, read if you want more in-depth info)

(If you’re interested in reading a timeline (with legal documents!) of the lawsuit(s) challenging SB 200, The American Redistricting Project has a comprehensive list. The most relevant of which is likely the Original Complaint by the plaintiffs)

2018:

  • An initiated state statute (i.e. a law we get to directly vote on on) called Proposition 4 is on the ballot in Utah.
  • According to Ballotpedia, the proposition creates “a seven-member independent redistricting commission to draft and recommend to the Utah State Legislature maps for congressional and state legislative districts according to certain criteria”
    • From the the original voter handout: comittee members are chosen “one by the Governor, three by legislative majority party leaders, and three by legislative minority party leaders”
  • Basically, instead of the legislature getting to decide district boundaries and who gets to vote for them, a committee of people chosen by both the majority and minority party do. This is to prevent gerrymandering
    • If you need a refresher/introduction to what gerrymandering is this short video from TED is a decent resource. It’s really important to understand.
  • Proposition 4 passes (very narrowly: votesmart fact page with vote breakdown), and becomes law.
  • What it means is: a committee of seven people chosen by both political parties, and the governor draw the maps, but the legislature can reject the map under certain conditions.

2020

  • The Utah Legislature passes SB200 (full text here). I’m not a lawyer, so do your own read-through. But as far as I can tell the crucial lines are 406 and 407: “The committee or the Legislature may, but is not required to, vote on or adopt a map submitted to the committee or the Legislature by the commission.”
  • This means that whatever maps the committee decides on are only suggestions, and the legislature can draw their own maps.

2021

  • The legislature rejects the committee suggestion for the district map, and passes their own district map.
  • The new map cuts Salt Lake City into 4 pieces (Critics argue that this is gerrymandering in favor of more Republican seats).
  • There’s an interactive map of district map data here
  • There’s a whole page (also with interactive maps) here that shows the two maps side-by-side so you can see the difference.
  • Dave’s Redistricting Maps is another cool interactive resource

2022

  • This is taken to court by Utah League of Women Voters and Mormon Women for Ethical Government in July 2022.
  • The court rejects some portions of the suit and accepts others, saying that the legislature can draw the maps subject to certain conditions (it’s a complicated legal ruling, do your own research). Essentially because they can alter any state statute according to the state constitution (there’s more argument and nuance here, once again do your own research)

2024

  • The Utah League of Women Voters takes the case to the Utah State Supreme Court.
  • Justia has this as a summary alongside the legal documents: > “In the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, the plaintiffs argued that the Legislature’s actions violated the Utah Constitution by nullifying the reforms enacted by the people through Proposition 4. The district court dismissed this claim, holding that the Legislature has the authority to amend or repeal any statute, including those enacted by citizen initiative, without limitation. The plaintiffs appealed this decision.”
  • For a quicker and friendlier overview, the Wikipedia Article summarizes and links to additonal resources.
  • The Utah State Legislature in response to this decision attempted to amend the state constitution to give themselves the authority to alter ballot initiatives with Amendment D to the Utah State Constitution.
  • The amendment was ruled unconstitutional by Judge Dianna Gibson and votes concerning the amendment were not counted on ballots. (Salt Lake Tribune Article, Link to the 16 page ruling by Judge Gibson)

2025

  • Judge Gibson gives the legislature 30 days to draw a new map, with the understanding that if the 30 day deadline is not met the judge will choose from maps submitted by the plaintiffs (Source: This Utah News Dispatch Article speaks more to that and links to the court decision here
  • The legislature publishes a statement about this deadline on their site calling the deadline rushed and arbitrary
  • The legislature creates “Map C” and sends it to the court. It is rejected by the judge. (Deseret News Article, )
  • Fox 13 includes an hour by hour summary of the meetings discussing the vote on this new map and it’s well worth a read
  • Judge Diana Gibson rejects Map C stating that “Map C was an extreme partisan gerrymander” in the conclusion of an 11 page legal ruling (Utah News Dispatch has an article here discussing the ruling)
  • The court rules that one of the plaintiff maps will be used
  • Salt Lake City is now its own district (see the maps for details)
  • An organization named “Securing American Greatness Inc.” donates $4,350,000 to Utahns for Representative Government (As stated on disclosures.utah.gov)
  • The organization Utahns for Representative Government hires Patriot Grassroots to do signature gathering for them. Utah ABC4 runs an article about this.

2026

  • I am approached by signature gatherers repeatedly in my day-to-day life and write this post as a result
  • Litigation about the whole system of drawing boundaries is ongoing, and efforts are being made by opponents to get Prop 4 removed from law
  • The primaries are coming up in June 2026. Go see who’s running
  • You can see what candidates will be on your ballot by entering your address on votesearch.utah.gov

Regardless of your political affiliations, stay informed, avoid ragebait from either side of the aisle, and register to vote!